<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cybersecurity on Nalar</title>
    <link>https://nalar.dev/tags/cybersecurity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cybersecurity on Nalar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nalar.dev/tags/cybersecurity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Practical Threat Modeling with Trust Boundaries and Abuse Cases</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/practical-threat-modeling-with-trust-boundaries/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/practical-threat-modeling-with-trust-boundaries/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Threat modeling is most useful before a vulnerability becomes a patch request. It gives a team a structured way to ask how a system can be misused, which assumptions are security-sensitive, and where defenses should exist.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A useful threat model does not need to be a large document. For many services, a one-page data-flow sketch plus a prioritized set of abuse cases is enough to improve design decisions.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;begin-with-assets-and-security-goals&#34;&gt;Begin with assets and security goals&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Start by identifying what the system is trying to protect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preventing SSRF in Backend Services That Fetch User-Supplied URLs</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/prevent-ssrf-backend-services/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/prevent-ssrf-backend-services/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Features that fetch a URL supplied by a user appear in webhook testers, image importers, link previewers, document converters, and integration platforms. They also create a server-side request forgery (SSRF) boundary: an attacker can try to make the backend send requests to destinations the attacker cannot reach directly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A secure design needs more than a blacklist of suspicious strings.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;understand-the-trust-boundary&#34;&gt;Understand the trust boundary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The dangerous capability is not URL parsing itself. It is allowing untrusted input to influence a network connection made with the server&amp;rsquo;s network identity.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reduce Software Supply Chain Risk with Dependency Controls</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/reduce-software-supply-chain-risk-with-dependency-controls/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/reduce-software-supply-chain-risk-with-dependency-controls/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Modern applications routinely execute code downloaded from package registries, container registries, build actions, and language-specific ecosystems. That convenience creates supply chain risk: an attacker does not need to compromise your source repository if they can compromise something your build trusts.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;No single control eliminates this risk. The practical approach is to reduce unnecessary trust and make dependency changes visible.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;treat-dependency-resolution-as-a-security-boundary&#34;&gt;Treat dependency resolution as a security boundary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A manifest may specify broad version ranges, while a lockfile records the exact dependency graph selected for a build.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
