<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fine-Tuning on Nalar</title>
    <link>https://nalar.dev/tags/fine-tuning/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fine-Tuning on Nalar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nalar.dev/tags/fine-tuning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Choose Between Prompting, RAG, and Fine-Tuning</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/choose-between-prompting-rag-and-fine-tuning/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/choose-between-prompting-rag-and-fine-tuning/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When an AI application produces weak results, teams often jump directly to fine-tuning. That can be the right choice, but many problems are cheaper and easier to solve with better prompting or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The three approaches change different parts of the system. &lt;strong&gt;Prompting&lt;/strong&gt; changes the instructions and context given at inference time. &lt;strong&gt;RAG&lt;/strong&gt; supplies relevant external information at inference time. &lt;strong&gt;Fine-tuning&lt;/strong&gt; changes the model&amp;rsquo;s learned parameters through additional training.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
