<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LLM Alignment on Nalar</title>
    <link>https://nalar.dev/tags/llm-alignment/</link>
    <description>Recent content in LLM Alignment on Nalar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nalar.dev/tags/llm-alignment/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Understand Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Alignment</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/understand-direct-preference-optimization-for-llm-alignment/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/understand-direct-preference-optimization-for-llm-alignment/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Supervised fine-tuning can teach a language model to imitate good answers, but many alignment problems are easier to express as comparisons: given two responses to the same prompt, which one is better?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A preference dataset captures that signal as triples containing a prompt, a preferred response, and a rejected response. The challenge is turning those comparisons into model updates without treating a subjective preference as an ordinary next-token target.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)&lt;/strong&gt; provides one practical answer. It trains a policy model to increase its relative preference for chosen responses over rejected responses while measuring that change against a fixed reference model. Unlike a common reinforcement-learning-from-human-feedback pipeline, standard DPO does not require training a separate reward model and then running a reinforcement-learning optimizer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
