<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LoRA on Nalar</title>
    <link>https://nalar.dev/tags/lora/</link>
    <description>Recent content in LoRA on Nalar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nalar.dev/tags/lora/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Understand LoRA for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/understand-lora-for-parameter-efficient-fine-tuning/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/understand-lora-for-parameter-efficient-fine-tuning/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Fine-tuning a large model does not always require updating every model parameter. &lt;strong&gt;Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)&lt;/strong&gt; takes advantage of this idea by keeping the original model weights frozen and learning much smaller matrices that modify selected layers.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For developers, the important benefit is not simply that LoRA is &amp;ldquo;smaller fine-tuning.&amp;rdquo; It changes what must be trained, stored, and moved between experiments. Understanding that distinction makes it easier to decide when LoRA is useful, what it does not save, and how adapter choices affect model behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
