<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Memory Safety on Nalar</title>
    <link>https://nalar.dev/tags/memory-safety/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Memory Safety on Nalar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nalar.dev/tags/memory-safety/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Understand Pin and Unpin in Rust</title>
      <link>https://nalar.dev/understand-pin-and-unpin-in-rust/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nalar.dev/understand-pin-and-unpin-in-rust/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most Rust values can move freely. Assign a value to another variable, pass it by value, return it from a function, or replace it inside a container, and the value may end up at a different memory address.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Usually that is exactly what you want. Rust&amp;rsquo;s ownership model tracks who owns a value, not where that value must remain in memory.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A smaller class of types is different. Some values become &lt;strong&gt;address-sensitive&lt;/strong&gt;: code relies on the value continuing to exist at the same memory location. Compiler-generated futures and carefully designed self-referential structures are common examples.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
